Ruiz-Rodriguez v. Gonzalez et al
| Arquelio Ruiz-Rodriguez |
| Denisse Longo-Quinones and Griselle Gonzalez |
| 3:2020cv01460 |
| September 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| William G Young |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Returned Unexecuted through USM as to Griselle Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Summons Returned Unexecuted) (rim) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed Through USM upon Denisse Longo-Quinones served on 10/13/2020, answer due 11/4/2020. (Attachments: #1 Summons Returned Executed) (rim) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Griselle Gonzalez, Denisse Longo-Quinones through the USMS, with copy of the order, complaint and USM-285. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (vdm) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Judge William G. Young on 9/28/2020. (EES)
|
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Arquelio Ruiz-Rodriguez, Pro se. Service due by 12/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rim) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Arquelio Ruiz-Rodriguez, Pro se. Responses due by 9/18/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(rim) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
