Parnas v. Murray et al
| Noa Parnas |
| Corporation and/or Entity A-D, Insurance Company B, JOHN DOE, Collin Murray and Insurance Company A |
| 3:2021cv01061 |
| February 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Gustavo A Gelpi |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for extension of time until 4/12/2021 to ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD filed by Jose A. Pagan-Nieves on behalf of Collin Murray Responses due by 3/25/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Pagan-Nieves, Jose) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to defendant, Collin Murray by All Plaintiffs upon Collin Murray served on 2/18/2021, answer due 3/11/2021. (Hernandez-Oharriz, Edgardo) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Collin Murray (Attachments: #1 Summons) (arg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi (arg) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDERS: |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number 0104-7177218.), filed by Noa Parnas. Service due by 5/10/2021, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet, #2 Category Sheet Categoy sheet, #3 Summons Summon Mr. Murray)(Hernandez-Oharriz, Edgardo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
