Perez-Mendez v. Tribunal de Mayaguez, et. al
Willfredo Perez-Mendez and Wilfredo Perez-Mendez |
Tribunal de Mayaguez, et. als., Tribunal de Mayaguez and Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico |
3:2022cv01269 |
June 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Francisco A Besosa |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL re 4 Order. Attorney Jennie M. Espada-Ocasio Appointed for Wilfredo Perez-Mendez. Signed by Clerk on 6/15/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice in the Spanish language)(by mail: Atty. Espada-Ocasio, Wilfredo Perez)(ab) |
![]() |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Tribunal de Mayaguez, et. als., filed by Wilfredo Perez-Mendez, Pro Se. Service due by 9/12/2022, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(ad) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/14/2022: #4 PSLC Transmittal Memorandum) (ab). |
Filing 2 ***RESTRICTED*** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Wilfredo Perez-Mendez, Pro Se. (ad) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Willfredo Perez-Mendez, Pro Se. Responses due by 6/27/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.