Panneflek v. Verastegui et al
| Ricardo Panneflek |
| Renzo Verastegui, Renatta Verastegui, Delivery DRD Corp., New Life Broadcasting, Inc., Arso Radio Corporation, XYZ Corporation, John Doe, Miami All Network Marketing Inc. and Jane Doe |
| 3:2022cv01282 |
| June 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Aida M Delgado-Colon |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) Re #20 Opinion and Order, #21 Judgment. (idg)
|
|
Filing 21
JUDGMENT: The Court DENIES co-defendant Arso Radio Corporation's request at ECF No. #18 . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), the motion for voluntary dismissal of the case with prejudice at ECF No. #17 is GRANTED without the imposition of attorney's fees. All pending motions are thus MOOT. The case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 1/20/2023. (gyr)
|
|
Filing 20
OPINION AND ORDER re #17 MOTION to dismiss with Prejudice as to All Defendants filed by Ricardo Panneflek. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), the motion for voluntary dismissal of the case with prejudice at ECF No. 17 is GRANTED without the imposition of attorney's fees. All pending motions are thus MOOT. Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Aida M. Delgado-Colon on 1/20/2023.(wm)
|
|
Filing 19
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Response to Motion for Voluntary Dismissal filed by Ricardo Panneflek Re: #18 Response to Motion filed by Arso Radio Corporation filed by Ricardo Panneflek. (Belendez-Ferrero, Laura) Modified relationship on 11/30/2022 (idg).
|
|
Filing 18
RESPONSE to Motion For Dismissal (DK. 17) filed by Arso Radio Corporation Re: #17 MOTION to dismiss with Prejudice as to All Defendants filed by Ricardo Panneflek filed by Arso Radio Corporation. (Rodriguez-Lopez, Luis)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION to dismiss with Prejudice as to All Defendants filed by Laura Belendez-Ferrero on behalf of Ricardo Panneflek Responses due by 11/30/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Belendez-Ferrero, Laura)
|
|
Filing 16
Co Defendant Arso's ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Luis M. Rodriguez-Lopez on behalf of Defendant Arso Radio Corporation.(Rodriguez-Lopez, Luis) Modified to add relationship on 10/31/2022 (idg).
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION for Extension of Time until October 28, 2022 to File Answer filed by Luis M. Rodriguez-Lopez on behalf of Arso Radio Corporation Responses due by 10/11/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Rodriguez-Lopez, Luis)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION Requesting Service by Publication filed by Ricardo Panneflek. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Summons, #3 Text of Proposed Order) (Belendez-Ferrero, Laura) Modified event and title on 9/15/2022 (idg).
|
|
Filing 13
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ricardo Panneflek upon Arso Radio Corporation served on 9/7/2022, answer due 9/28/2022; New Life Broadcasting, Inc. served on 9/7/2022, answer due 9/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Belendez-Ferrero, Laura)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Service by Publication as to Miami All Network Marketing Inc., Renatta Verastegui, Renzo Verastegui filed by Laura Belendez-Ferrero on behalf of Ricardo Panneflek Responses due by 9/26/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Statement under Penalty of Perjury from Process Server, #2 Exhibit 2-Summons for Service by Publication, #3 Text of Proposed Order for Service of Summons by Publication)(Belendez-Ferrero, Laura)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER re #10 MOTION Submitting Certified Translations. NOTED. Signed by Judge Aida M. Delgado-Colon on 8/29/2022. (ao) Modified italic text on 8/31/2022 (idg).
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION Submitting Certified Translations filed by Laura Belendez-Ferrero on behalf of Ricardo Panneflek Responses due by 8/23/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 8, #2 Exhibit 10, #3 Exhibit 13)(Belendez-Ferrero, Laura)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER. The notice of appearance filed as "motion for leave to appear" at ECF No. 6 is NOTED. Plaintiff's motion requesting an order at ECF No. 8 is DENIED. Notably, plaintiff moves the Court to "enter the order to show cause as to why the preliminary injunction should not issue", however is yet to submit returned or executed summons in this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, cited by plaintiff in its proposed order at ECF No. 2-1, (stating that the Court "may issue a preliminary injunction only on notice to the adverse party.") Signed by Judge Aida M. Delgado-Colon on 7/28/2022.(wm)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION requesting Order as to Hearing on Order to Show Cause filed by Laura Belendez-Ferrero on behalf of Ricardo Panneflek Responses due by 8/11/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Belendez-Ferrero, Laura)
|
|
Filing 7
REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification), filed by Ricardo Panneflek.(Belendez-Ferrero, Laura)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Leave to Appear on Behalf of Plaintiff filed by Samuel F. Pamias-Portalatin on behalf of All Plaintiffs Responses due by 7/5/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Appearance Form)(Pamias-Portalatin, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Issued as to Arso Radio Corporation, Delivery DRD Corp., Miami All Network Marketing Inc., New Life Broadcasting, Inc., Renatta Verastegui, Renzo Verastegui. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (vdm)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Aida M. Delgado-Colon. (vdm)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Filing Exhibits Case Initiating Documents filed by Laura Belendez-Ferrero on behalf of Ricardo Panneflek Responses due by 6/30/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons)(Belendez-Ferrero, Laura) Modified on 6/16/2022 to correct event title (mcm).
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Laura Belendez-Ferrero on behalf of Ricardo Panneflek Responses due by 6/30/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Belendez-Ferrero, Laura)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT (Verified) against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number BPRDC-7799303.), filed by Ricardo Panneflek. Service due by 9/14/2022, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Certificate of Registration, #2 Exhibit 2-Samples of Use Collagen 21, #3 Exhibit 3-Defendants Use of Infringing Product, #4 Exhibit 4-Office Action, #5 Exhibit 5-Response to Office Action, #6 Exhibit 6-Types of Collagen, #7 Exhibit 7-Arso Radio Group Letter, #8 Exhibit 8-Response Arso Radio Group, #9 Exhibit 9-Cease and Desist Letter REV and Miami All Network, #10 Exhibit 10-Response from REV and Miami All Network, #11 Exhibit 11-Google Search, #12 Exhibit 12-Cease and Desist NLB, #13 Exhibit 13-New Life Response, #14 Exhibit 14-DRD Cease and Desist)(Belendez-Ferrero, Laura)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
