Garcia-Rosas v. Administracion de Correccion
Plaintiff: Jonathan Garcia-Rosas
Defendant: Administracion de Correccion
Case Number: 3:2023cv01096
Filed: March 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Presiding Judge: Jay A Garcia-Gregory
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2023 Filing 11 Notice of Appointment of Counsel Giovanna Mojica-Rivera, Esq. to represent Jonathan Garcia-Rosas re 9 Order. Signed by Clerk on 5/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notification in the Spanish language)(gav) Modified on 5/1/2023 typo (gav).
April 28, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk re: #7 MOTION for Leave to File Spanish language documents MOTION requesting Order. **STRICKEN AS PER ORDER AT D.E. #8** (gav)
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Counsel shall confer with Plaintiff to review the legal requirements of the claims asserted and provide Plaintiff with an initial assessment of the viability of these claims. Counsel shall also file an English-language complaint, specifying the basis for federal jurisdiction and clarifying the claims asserted. Status Report and/or English Complaint due by 5/22/2023. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 4/27/2023. (MQ)
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER striking #7 MOTION for Leave to File Spanish language documents and MOTION requesting Order. In this district, all documents must be filed in English or accompanied by a certified English translation, as required by 48 U.S.C. 864 and Local Civil Rule 5(c). Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 4/27/2023. (MQ)
April 25, 2023 Filing 7 **STRICKEN AS PER ORDER AT D.E. #8*** MOTION in the Spanish language for Leave to File Spanish language documents, MOTION requesting Order filed by Jonathan Garcia-Rosas, pro se. Responses due by 5/9/2023. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Envelope for multi-defendants pleading)(mcm) Modified on 4/28/2023 (gav).
April 12, 2023 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. The pleading cannot be signed by multiple plaintiffs as they have individual cases and must file separate motions. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 5/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 Motion in the Spanish language, #2 Envelope) (Sent by mail to Jonathan Garcia-Rosas) (mcm) Modified on 4/12/2023 to add notification (mcm).
April 10, 2023 Filing 6 ***RESTRICTED*** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jonathan Garcia-Rosas. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (rim)
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER re #2 Complaint. Plaintiff's pro se status does not insulate him from complying with this Court's procedural rules. Ahmed v. Rosenblatt, 118 F.3d 886, 890 (1st Cir. 1997). In this district, all documents must be filed in English or accompanied by a certified English translation, as required by 48 U.S.C. 864 and Local Civil Rule 5(g). Plaintiff shall file a complaint in the English language. The complaint must specify the basis for federal subject-matter jurisdiction. See U.S. ex rel. Ondis v. City of Woonsocket, 587 F.3d 49, 54 (1st Cir. 2009) (stating that federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and, thus, the party asserting jurisdiction has the burden of demonstrating its existence by a preponderance of the evidence.). English Complaint due by 4/24/2023. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 3/9/2023. (MQ)
March 6, 2023 Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. Pleading or document is not in the English language and plaintiff has not moved for permission to file pleading in the Spanish language. L.Civ.R. 5. Pro se pleading is not in the form prescribed by U.S. District Court for such action, or in a format substantially conforming thereto. L.Civ.R. 3(c). Plaintiff did not pay the corresponding filing fee which is $402.00 for Civil Right Complaints under 42 U.S.C. 1983, nor filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Plaintiffs request to proceed without prepayment of fees does not comply with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 1915 and L.Civ. Rs. 3.1 (a), (b)(2) and (c)(4). The Prisoner did not attach a statement certified by the appropriate institutional officer, showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months in his/her institutional account. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 3/27/2023. (ad)
March 1, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jonathan Garcia-Rosas, Pro Se. Responses due by 3/15/2023. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(ad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garcia-Rosas v. Administracion de Correccion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Garcia-Rosas
Represented By: Giovanna Michelle Mojica-Rivera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Administracion de Correccion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?