Rodriguez-Pagan v. Administracion de Correccion
| Antonio Rodriguez-Pagan |
| Administracion de Correccion |
| 3:2023cv01108 |
| March 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Pedro A Delgado-Hernandez |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ***RESTRICTED*** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Antonio Rodriguez-Pagan. (Attachments: #1 Envelope for multi-defendants pleading) (mcm) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. The pleading cannot be signed by multiple plaintiffs as they have individual cases and must file separate motions. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 5/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 Motion in the Spanish language, #2 Envelope) (Sent by mail to Antonio Rodriguez-Pagan) (mcm) |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT: See attached. This case is now closed for statistical purposes. Signed by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez on 3/30/2023. (AEM) |
Filing 4
ORDER: See attached. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez on 3/30/2023. (AEM)
|
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. Pleading or document is not in the English language and plaintiff has not moved for permission to file pleading in the Spanish language. L.Civ.R. 5. Pro se pleading is not in the form prescribed by U.S. District Court for such action, or in a format substantially conforming thereto. L.Civ.R. 3(c). Plaintiff did not pay the corresponding filing fee which is $402.00 for Civil Right Complaints under 42 U.S.C. 1983, nor filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Plaintiffs request to proceed without prepayment of fees does not comply with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 1915 and L.Civ. Rs. 3.1 (a), (b)(2) and (c)(4). The Prisoner did not attach a statement certified by the appropriate institutional officer, showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months in his/her institutional account. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 3/28/2023. (ad) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Administracion de Correccion, filed by Antonio Rodriguez-Pagan, Pro Se. Service due by 6/5/2023, (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ad) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Antonio Rodriguez-Pagan, Pro Se. Responses due by 3/20/2023. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez-Pagan v. Administracion de Correccion | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Antonio Rodriguez-Pagan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Administracion de Correccion | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
