Agility International Logistics, Inc. v. International Sourcing and Marketing, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Agility International Logistics, Inc.
Defendant: International Sourcing and Marketing, Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2008cv00389
Filed: October 16, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
County: Providence
Presiding Judge: David L. Martin
Presiding Judge: Ernest C. Torres
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 09:1 U.S. Arbitration Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER. So Ordered by Judge William E. Smith on 3/23/09. (Jackson, Ryan)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Agility International Logistics, Inc. v. International Sourcing and Marketing, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Agility International Logistics, Inc.
Represented By: Kristin E. Rodgers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: International Sourcing and Marketing, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?