UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Moitoso

Plaintiff: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant: Sharon Moitoso
Case Number: 1:2011cv00342
Filed: August 3, 2011
Court: Rhode Island District Court
Office: Providence Office
County: Providence
Presiding Judge: Mary M Lisi
Referring Judge: David L. Martin
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29:1001
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 20, 2012 29 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Plaintiff's 16 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff may submit any claim for interest, costs, and attorneys fees within 14 days of entry of this Memorandum and Order. So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M. Lisi on 9/20/2012. (Duhamel, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Moitoso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Represented By: Brooks R. Magratten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharon Moitoso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.