Callahan v. Wall et al
| Ryan Callahan |
| Ashbel T. Wall, Fred Vohr, Jennifer Clarke and Adult Correctional Institution |
| 1:2016cv00160 |
| April 4, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Providence Office |
| Providence |
| William E. Smith |
| Patricia A. Sullivan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER adopting 103 Report and Recommendations and granting 94 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 102 Motion for Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff shall show cause within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order whey his claim against Defendant Clarke should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute - So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 8/11/2017. (Barletta, Barbara)
|
|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 78 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 78 Motion for TRO; adopting 86 Report and Recommendations. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 4/12/2017. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 39 Motion for prima facie Evidence; adopting 41 Report and Recommendations; denying 44 Motion for Re-Hearing; and, denying without prejudice 23 Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 11/22/2016. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
