Unetixs Vascular, Inc. v. CorVascular Diagnostics, LLC

Plaintiff: Unetixs Vascular, Inc.
Defendant: CorVascular Diagnostics, LLC
Case Number: 1:2016cv00530
Filed: September 26, 2016
Court: Rhode Island District Court
Office: Providence Office
County: Providence
Referring Judge: Lincoln D. Almond
Presiding Judge: John J. McConnell
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 9, 2017 25 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 19 Motion to Dismiss- So Ordered by District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 3/8/2017. (Barletta, Barbara)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Unetixs Vascular, Inc. v. CorVascular Diagnostics, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Unetixs Vascular, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen F. Del Sesto
Represented By: William M. Dolan, III
Represented By: Nicholas L. Nybo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CorVascular Diagnostics, LLC
Represented By: Brenna Anatone Force
Represented By: James R. Oswald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?