Coffin v. Ametek Inc. et al
Victor Coffin |
Avco Corporation, R.W. BECKETT COMPANY, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, BELL HELICOPTER, INGERSOLL-RAND INC, NEW YORKER BOILER COMPANY, Textron Inc., General Electric Company, Honeywell International Inc., Ametek Inc., Maine Central Railroad Company, CBS Corporation, GEMCO INC, JAY-KAY SALES CO. INC, FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC, Ingersoll - Rand Inc and The Gage Company |
1:2018cv00348 |
June 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Providence Office |
Providence |
Lincoln D Almond |
William E Smith |
P.I. : Asbestos |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 1 NEW CASE/NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Providence County Superior Court, Case Number PC-2018-1119. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0103-1229874, filed by Avco Corporation, BELL HELICOPTER. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit A of Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit B of Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit C of Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit D of Notice of Removal, #7 Exhibit 1 of Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #8 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Ruggieri, James) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Potter, Carrie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.