New England Lead Burning Company, Inc. v. PDS Engineering & Construction, Inc.
New England Lead Burning Company, Inc. |
PDS Engineering & Construction, Inc. |
1:2019cv00520 |
October 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
William E Smith |
Patricia A Sullivan |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to PDS Engineering & Construction, Inc. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 9 APPLICATION for Clerk's Entry of Default filed by New England Lead Burning Company, Inc. as to PDS Engineering & Construction, Inc.. (Fine, David) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by New England Lead Burning Company, Inc.. PDS Engineering & Construction, Inc. served on 10/11/2019, answer due 11/1/2019. (Fine, David) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Alexandra N. Mansfield to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number 0103-1424201 ) filed by New England Lead Burning Company, Inc.. (Fine, David) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by New England Lead Burning Company, Inc.. (Fine, David) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to PDS Engineering & Construction, Inc. (McGuire, Vickie) (Main Document 5 replaced on 10/7/2019) (McGuire, Vickie). |
TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Alexandra N. Mansfield. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 10/7/2019. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 4 Summons Request filed by New England Lead Burning Company, Inc.. (Fine, David) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Thomas J. Conte to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number 0103-1423670 ) filed by New England Lead Burning Company, Inc.. (Fine, David) |
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Thomas Conte. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 10/4/2019. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Potter, Carrie) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 400.00, receipt number 0103-1422652 ), filed by New England Lead Burning Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fine, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 400.00, receipt number 0103-1422652 ), filed by New England Lead Burning Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fine, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: New England Lead Burning Company, Inc. v. PDS Engineering & Construction, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: PDS Engineering & Construction, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: New England Lead Burning Company, Inc. | |
Represented By: | David L. Fine |
Represented By: | Alexandra N. Mansfield |
Represented By: | Thomas Conte |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.