Roland v. Coyne-Fague et al
| Luis Roland |
| Walter Duffy, Patricia A. Coyne-Fague and Nunos Figueiredo |
| 1:2019cv00598 |
| November 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Lincoln D Almond |
| Mary S McElroy |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 JUDGMENT dismissing this civil action - So Entered by the Clerk of Court on 12/5/2019. (Urizandi, Nisshy) |
TEXT ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 and finds that the Complaint does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Therefore, the Court DENIES the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) and DISMISSES his Complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915 - So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 12/5/2019. (Urizandi, Nisshy)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Luis Roland. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Summary)(Hicks, Alyson) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Luis Roland. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Summary)(Hicks, Alyson) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Luis Roland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope, #3 Notice of Service)(Hicks, Alyson) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Luis Roland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope, #3 Notice of Service)(Hicks, Alyson) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
