Mehboob G. v. Social Security Administration
Mehboob Ahmed Ganchi |
Social Security Administration |
1:2020cv00330 |
July 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
John J McConnell |
Patricia A Sullivan |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 427 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT ORDER adopting #5 Report and Recommendations and denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Plaintiff shall file the filing fee on or before 10/19/20 or this case may be dismissed -- So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 9/18/2020. (Barletta, Barbara) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mehboob Ahmed Ganchi Objections to R&R due by 9/15/2020.. I recommend that Plaintiff's application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit (ECF No. 3) be DENIED and that Plaintiff be directed to pay the filing fee within thirty days of the adoption of this recommendation. If Plaintiff does not pay the filing fee, I recommend that the case be dismissed. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan on 9/1/2020. (Saucier, Martha) |
Case reassigned to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Filing 4 ORDER re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mehboob Ahmed Ganchi. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan on 8/4/2020. (Saucier, Martha) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mehboob Ahmed Ganchi. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mehboob Ahmed Ganchi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supporting Memorandum, #3 Letter from Son)(Potter, Carrie) |
DOCKET NOTE: The Clerk's Office received a CD enclosed with the Complaint, however, it cannot be uploaded to ECF. The CD is available for review in the Clerk's Office. (Potter, Carrie) |
CORRECTIVE DOCKET ENTRY Regarding: #1 Complaint: This case has been electronically filed and processed, however, after a quality control review the following deficiencies were found: Civil Cover Sheet completed. The filer is directed to file a completed Civil Cover Sheet within one day. (Potter, Carrie) |
Notice of Availability to Receive Documents Electronically. Pro Se litigants are encouraged to review the details of the Consent & Registration Form and if interested, complete the Registration Form and return it to the Clerks Office. Click # here to access the form. (Potter, Carrie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mehboob G. v. Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mehboob Ahmed Ganchi | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.