Lemire v. State of Rhode Island et al
Jeffrey E. Lemire |
Barrington Town Hall, Jamestown, City of Newport, City of North Providence, Town of Bristol, North Smithfield Town Hall, Smithfield Town Hall, City of Central Falls, Middletown Hall, Town of Cumberland, Lincoln Town Hall, State of Rhode Island, City of Providence, Portsmouth, City of Woonsocket, Pawtucket City Hall, East Providence, Warren Town Hall, Tiverton City Hall and Little Compton |
1:2020cv00408 |
September 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Lincoln D Almond |
William E Smith |
Civil Rights: Voting |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT ORDER denying as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: On September 21, 2020, Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond issued a #4 Memorandum and Order stating that this case would be dismissed unless Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint that complied with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by October 9, 2020. Because Plaintiff has not filed an Amended Complaint, this case is dismissed without prejudice, and #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot.. So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 11/2/2020. (Jackson, Ryan) |
Filing 5 ORDER RETURNING DOCUMENT: Complaint, Exhibits and IFP returned to Jeffrey Lemire. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 9/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Returned Document)(Potter, Carrie) |
Notice of Availability to Receive Documents Electronically. Pro Se litigants are encouraged to review the details of the Consent & Registration Form and if interested, complete the Registration Form and return it to the Clerks Office. Click # here to access the form. (Potter, Carrie) |
TEXT ORDER denying without prejudice #3 Emergency Motion for Hearing, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond's #4 Memorandum and Order. So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 9/22/2020. (Jackson, Ryan) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: #1 Complaint filed by Jeffrey E. Lemire, #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jeffrey E. Lemire. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an Amended Complaint by October 9, 2020 that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as discussed. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 9/21/2020. (Noel, Jeannine) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis referred for determination to Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Jackson, Ryan) |
CORRECTIVE DOCKET ENTRY Regarding: #1 Complaint : This case has been electronically filed and processed, however, after a quality control review the following deficiencies were found: Civil Cover Sheet not attached. The filer is directed to file a Civil Cover Sheet within one day. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 3 Emergency MOTION for Hearing filed by Jeffrey E. Lemire. Responses due by 9/28/2020. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 3 Emergency MOTION for Hearing filed by Jeffrey E. Lemire. Responses due by 9/28/2020. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jeffrey E. Lemire. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jeffrey E. Lemire. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jeffrey E. Lemire.(Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jeffrey E. Lemire.(Potter, Carrie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.