Patricia B. v. Saul
Plaintiff: Patricia Burgos (Brown)
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2020cv00424
Filed: September 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Presiding Judge: Lincoln D Almond
Referring Judge: William E Smith
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2020 Case reassigned to District Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond no longer assigned to the case as presider. (Noel, Jeannine)
October 2, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Assignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. Within 14 days of receipt of this notice, parties must either consent or decline to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by completing a Consent/Declination form. # Please click here to access the form . Consent to Assignment of Magistrate Judge due by 10/16/2020. (Simoncelli, Michael)
September 28, 2020 Filing 4 SOCIAL SECURITY CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED.The defendant shall have up to and including 11/27/2020 to enter an appearance and either file a dispositive motion or the Certified Administrative Record which shall be deemed an answer (general denial) to the plaintiff's complaint as outlined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b)(3). (McGuire, Vickie)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 9/28/2020. (Noel, Jeannine)
September 25, 2020 Filing 3 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Patricia Burgos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit in forma pauperis)(Spunzo, David)
September 25, 2020 Filing 3 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Patricia Burgos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit in forma pauperis)(Spunzo, David)
September 25, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No fee paid, USA, Waived by Statute, or IFP.), filed by Patricia Burgos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Spunzo, David)
September 25, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No fee paid, USA, Waived by Statute, or IFP.), filed by Patricia Burgos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Spunzo, David)
September 25, 2020 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Smith, Rana)
September 25, 2020 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Smith, Rana)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patricia B. v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Burgos (Brown)
Represented By: David F. Spunzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?