Laccinole v. Lifespan Corporation
Christopher Laccinole |
Lifespan Corporation |
1:2020cv00468 |
November 2, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Lincoln D Almond |
Mary S McElroy |
William E Smith |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 RESPONSE In Opposition to #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court with Supporting Memo filed by All Defendants. Replies due by 12/29/2020. (Dolan, Mark) |
Filing 7 RULE 16 STATEMENT by Christopher Laccinole. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Hicks, Alyson) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court with Supporting Memo filed by Christopher Laccinole. Responses due by 12/22/2020. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Memorandum)(Hicks, Alyson) |
Case reassigned to District Judge William E. Smith. District Judge Mary S. McElroy no longer assigned to the case. (Urizandi, Nisshy) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Mary S. McElroy: Telephonic Rule 16 Conference held on 12/1/2020. Christopher Laccinole and Mark P. Dolan participated. (Urizandi, Nisshy) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Remote Hearing: Telephonic Rule 16 Conference set for 12/1/2020 at 10:30 AM before District Judge Mary S. McElroy. The Court will send call in information to all parites by mail and/or email. (Urizandi, Nisshy) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Lifespan Corporation.(Dolan, Mark) |
Filing 3 STATE COURT RECORD received electronically from the State of Rhode Island. (Hicks, Alyson) |
Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Hicks, Alyson) |
Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Hicks, Alyson) |
Filing 1 NEW CASE/NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Washington County District Court, Case Number 4CA-2020-00819. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0103-1564538, filed by Lifespan Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Complaint (4th Division), #2 Notice of Filing, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dolan, Mark) |
Filing 1 NEW CASE/NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Washington County District Court, Case Number 4CA-2020-00819. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0103-1564538, filed by Lifespan Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Complaint (4th Division), #2 Notice of Filing, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dolan, Mark) |
Case assigned to District Judge Mary S. McElroy and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Hicks, Alyson) |
Case assigned to District Judge Mary S. McElroy and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Hicks, Alyson) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Laccinole v. Lifespan Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Christopher Laccinole | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lifespan Corporation | |
Represented By: | Mark P. Dolan |
Represented By: | Mark P. Dolan, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.