Avallon v. City of Newport et al
Kimberly Avallon |
Eric Adkins, Ian McGregor and City of Newport |
1:2020cv00515 |
December 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Lincoln D Almond |
William E Smith |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER entered referring case to Mediation pursuant to this Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution Plan to be scheduled in late-November 2021. Information about the Plan can be found by clicking #here. So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 1/28/2021. (Jackson, Ryan) |
Filing 8 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Factual Discovery to be completed by 7/26/2021; Plaintiff Expert Disclosures shall be made by 8/27/2021; Defendant Expert Disclosures shall be made by 9/27/2021; All Expert Discovery to be completed by 10/27/2021; Dispositive Motions to be filed by 11/26/2021; Pretrial Memorandum due 30 days after decision on any pending motions, or if no motions are pending, by 11/26/2021. So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 1/28/2021. (Jackson, Ryan) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge William E. Smith: Rule 16 Conference via Zoom held on 1/26/2021: counsel present: M. Garland; M. DeSisto. (Jackson, Ryan) |
Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Garland, Michael) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Hearing: Rule 16 Conference via Zoom scheduled for Tuesday 1/26/2021 at 10:00 AM as a Remote Hearing before District Judge William E. Smith.(Zoom Meeting ID: 161 918 6057, Passcode: 435298) (Jackson, Ryan) |
TEXT ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to begin their mandatory disclosures immediately, before the Rule 16 conference. To the extent that the parties wish to begin discovery on a cooperative basis prior to the initial conference, they are encouraged to do so. So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 12/22/2020. (Jackson, Ryan) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael W. Garland on behalf of Kimberly Avallon (Garland, Michael) |
Filing 4 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Hicks, Alyson) |
Filing 4 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Hicks, Alyson) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Eric Adkins, City of Newport, Ian McGregor.(DeSisto, Marc) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Eric Adkins, City of Newport, Ian McGregor.(DeSisto, Marc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Marc DeSisto on behalf of All Defendants (DeSisto, Marc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Marc DeSisto on behalf of All Defendants (DeSisto, Marc) |
Filing 1 NEW CASE/NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Newport County Superior Court, Case Number nc-2019-0291. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0103-1575584, filed by Ian McGregor, Eric Adkins, City of Newport. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Notice of Removal - State Court, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(DeSisto, Marc) |
Filing 1 NEW CASE/NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Newport County Superior Court, Case Number nc-2019-0291. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0103-1575584, filed by Ian McGregor, Eric Adkins, City of Newport. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Notice of Removal - State Court, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(DeSisto, Marc) |
Case assigned to District Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Hicks, Alyson) |
Case assigned to District Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Hicks, Alyson) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.