United States of America v. Zenga et al
| United States Attorney's Office - District of RI and United States of America |
| Ronald W. Zenga |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2021cv00458 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Lincoln D Almond |
| John J McConnell |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 3001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion to Continue. By February 14, 2022, the Government shall file a memorandum which provides its position: (1) on Inmate Zenga's Motion for Hearing; (2) on Inmate Zenga's request to transfer this garnishment proceeding to the Southern District of Indiana, where he is currently incarcerated; and (3) on the applicability of the two garnishment exemptions claimed by Inmate Zenga. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 1/14/2022. (Noel, Jeannine)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Continue filed by United States of America. Responses due by 1/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Rogers, Mary) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #8 MOTION to Continue referred for determination to Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Jackson, Ryan) |
|
TEXT ORDER - By January 14, 2022, the Government shall file a memorandum which provides its position: (1) on Inmate Zenga's Motion for Hearing; (2) on Inmate Zenga's request to transfer this garnishment proceeding to the Southern District of Indiana, where he is currently incarcerated; and (3) on the applicability of the two garnishment exemptions claimed by Inmate Zenga. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 1/4/2022. (Noel, Jeannine)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 MOTION for Hearing referred for determination to Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Jackson, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 CLAIM for Exemption Form by Ronald W. Zenga. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Hearing filed by Ronald W. Zenga. Responses due by 1/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Writ of Garnishment by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Objections to Writ Answer due by 1/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America upon the Garnishee and Defendant (Rogers, Mary) |
| CASE PERMANENTLY ASSIGNED Since Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. has determined that this case is in fact related to CR19-112; this case is permanently assigned to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. for all further proceedings (Jackson, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Post-Judgment Garnishment & Instructions to the Defendant. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 2 WRIT OF GARNISHMENT issued. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| CASE CONDITIONALLY ASSIGNED to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. Related Case Number 19-cr-112 based upon the indication on the cover sheet that a related case previously was assigned to the presiding judge. The assignment is subject to the presiding judge's determination that the cases, in fact, are related. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment , filed by United States Attorney's Office - District of RI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Writ of Garnishment, #3 Government's Notice and Instructions, #4 Proposed Clerk's Notice, #5 Request for Hearing Form)(Rogers, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
