Palumbo v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
| Scott D. Palumbo |
| Amazon.com, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00316 |
| August 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Lincoln D Almond |
| William E Smith |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of VIDEO Hearing: VIDEO Rule 16 Conference set for 11/4/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond.(Zoom Meeting ID: 160 323 8960, Passcode: 906486) (Leyva, Lucia) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond to conduct a Rule 16 Conference. (Urizandi, Nissheneyra) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Sarah B. Affel to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number ARIDC-1792190 ) filed by Amazon.com, Inc.. (Sweeney, Sara) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Daniel B. Klein to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number ARIDC-1792188 ) filed by Amazon.com, Inc.. (Sweeney, Sara) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL by Amazon.com, Inc..(Sweeney, Sara) |
TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Sarah B. Affel. So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 9/6/2022. (DaCruz, Kayla)
|
|
TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Daniel B. Klein. So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 9/6/2022. (DaCruz, Kayla)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF RECUSAL entered. Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. recused. Case reassigned to District Judge William E. Smith for all further proceedings. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 8/30/2022. (Simoncelli, Michael)
|
| Filing 5 STATE COURT RECORD received electronically from the State of Rhode Island. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sara E. Sweeney on behalf of AMAZON.COM, INC. (Sweeney, Sara) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AMAZON.COM, INC.. (Sweeney, Sara) |
| Filing 1 NEW CASE/NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Newport County Superior Court, Case Number NC-2022-0192. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ARIDC-1790316, filed by AMAZON.COM, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint and Summons, #2 Exhibit Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sweeney, Sara) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Palumbo v. Amazon.Com, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scott D. Palumbo | |
| Represented By: | Timothy M. Bliss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amazon.com, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Sara E. Sweeney |
| Represented By: | Daniel B. Klein |
| Represented By: | Sarah B. Affel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
