Arnold v. Department of Corrections
Michael Wayne Arnold |
Department of Corrections and Prison Guard Delgado |
1:2022cv00334 |
September 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Lincoln D Almond |
William E Smith |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Prison Guard Delgado. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
Filing 5 Summons Request filed by Michael Wayne Arnold. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
Filing 4 Letter of Support by Michael Wayne Arnold re #1 Complaint (DaCruz, Kayla) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Department of Corrections. (Attachments: #1 Summons RIAG)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (DaCruz, Kayla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 402.00 receipt number 14670026960 ), filed by Michael Wayne Arnold. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 DOC Summons, #3 RIAG Summons)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
CASE CONDITIONALLY ASSIGNED to District Judge William E. Smith. Related Case Number 15-cv-80, and 22-cv-158 based upon the indication on the cover sheet that a related case previously was assigned to the presiding judge. The assignment is subject to the presiding judge's determination that the cases, in fact, are related. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.