Guo v. Cuny
| Hongnian Guo |
| Zeke Cuny, Sheila Heien and Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company |
| 1:2023cv00334 |
| August 17, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| John J McConnell |
| Patricia A Sullivan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (Magratten, Brooks) |
| Filing 26 ANSWER to #21 Amended Complaint by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.(Magratten, Brooks) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by Brooks R. Magratten on behalf of Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Magratten, Brooks) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by Stanley F. Pupecki on behalf of Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Pupecki, Stanley) |
| Filing 23 Summons Issued as to Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 22 Summons Request filed by Hongnian Guo. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 21 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, filed by Hongnian Guo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DaCruz, Kayla) Modified on 10/4/2023 to correct docket text (DaCruz, Kayla). |
TEXT ORDER Granting #17 Motion to Dismiss: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #17 is GRANTED. Ms. Heien is not the proper Defendant to be sued in the ERISA action. Also, the fraud allegations against her are preempted by ERISA. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an Amended Complaint within 14 days that names the correct Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. Failure to do so, shall result in this case being terminated. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 10/3/2023. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
| Filing 20 REPLY to Response re #18 Response to Motion to Dismiss filed by Sheila Heien. (Magratten, Brooks) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #19 Motion for Leave to Proceed as Pro Se Electronic Filer. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 9/26/2023. (Simoncelli, Michael)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION for Leave to Proceed as Pro Se Electronic Filer filed by Hongnian Guo. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE In Opposition to #17 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by Hongnian Guo. Replies due by 10/2/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by Sheila Heien. Responses due by 10/4/2023. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Memorandum)(Magratten, Brooks) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Stanley F. Pupecki on behalf of Sheila Heien (Pupecki, Stanley) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Brooks R. Magratten on behalf of Sheila Heien (Magratten, Brooks) |
| Filing 14 Summons Issued as to Sheila Heien. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 13 Summons Request filed by Hongnian Guo. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT, filed by Hongnian Guo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Motion to Amend)(Kenny, Meghan) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion to Dismiss: Defendant Zeke Cuny's Motion to Dismiss #9 is GRANTED. Mr. Cuny is not the proper Defendant to be sued in this action. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an Amended Complaint within 14 days that names the correct Defendant. Failure to do so, shall result in this case being terminated. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 9/12/2023. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
|
TEXT ORDER denying #7 MOTION Opposing Removal re: #1 Notice of Removal: The Plaintiffs Motion to Remand #6 is DENIED (Filed as a "Notice of Filing"). Mr. Guo's Complaint centers on a dispute over a disability policy governed by ERISA. Therefore, this dispute is governed by federal law and the Defendant was entitled to remove it to this Court. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 9/12/2023. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response re #10 Response to Motion to Dismiss filed by Zeke Cuny. (Magratten, Brooks) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE In Opposition to #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Hongnian Guo. Replies due by 9/6/2023. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Zeke Cuny. Responses due by 9/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Memorandum, #2 Exhibit STD Policy, #3 Exhibit LTD Policy)(Magratten, Brooks) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE In Opposition to #7 MOTION Opposing Removal re: #1 Notice of Removal - New Case, filed by Zeke Cuny. Replies due by 8/30/2023. (Magratten, Brooks) |
| Filing 7 MOTION Opposing Removal re: #1 Notice of Removal - New Case, filed by Hongnian Guo. Responses due by 9/5/2023. (McGuire, Vickie) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing by Hongnian Guo re #1 Notice of Removal - New Case, (McGuire, Vickie) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Stanley F. Pupecki on behalf of Zeke Cuny (Pupecki, Stanley) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Brooks R. Magratten on behalf of Zeke Cuny (Magratten, Brooks) |
| Filing 3 STATE COURT RECORD received electronically from the State of Rhode Island. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 1 NEW CASE/NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Providence County District Court, Case Number 6CA-2023-07921. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ARIDC-1901821, filed by Zeke Cuny. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Letter, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Magratten, Brooks) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
