Gonzales v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
| Wilson M. Gonzales |
| Rui Diniz, Richard Thompson, Todd Harbeck and Rhode Island Department of Corrections |
| 1:2024cv00249 |
| June 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| William E Smith |
| Patricia A Sullivan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice of Acceptance of Service filed by Rui Diniz, Richard Thompson, Todd Harbeck. Rui Diniz served on 8/21/2024, answer due 10/21/2024; Richard Thompson served on 8/21/2024, answer due 10/21/2024; Todd Harbeck served on 8/21/2024, answer due 10/21/2024. (Shaw, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF SERVICE: The Court has granted IFP status and ordered the complaint to be served. Pursuant to the Agreement on Service between the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island and the Rhode Island Attorney General, this Notice constitutes service as directed by the Court. Within 30 days, the RI Attorney General shall file a Notice of Acceptance of Service or a Notice of Declination of Service or both if necessary on behalf of the defendant(s) named in the complaint. # Please click here to access the Acceptance of Service form or # Please click here to access the Declination of Service form .Notice of Acceptance or Declination of Service due by 8/21/2024. (Kenny, Meghan) |
TEXT ORDER granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk's Office is directed to procure summonses so that Plaintiff's #1 Complaint may be served. Plaintiff must pay as an initial filing fee the greater of twenty percent (20%) of the average monthly deposits to his account or the average monthly balance for the six months prior to the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Subsequently, he must pay monthly twenty percent (20%) of the previous month's balance in his account. See id. 1915(b)(2). Plaintiff's account during the applicable period had an average monthly balance of $231.15 and average monthly deposits of $70. Accordingly, Plaintiff is required to pay as an initial filing fee $46.23 ($231.15 x 20% = $46.23). See id. Defendant Rhode Island Department of Corrections is directed to forward to the Court each month 20% of the previous month's balance in Plaintiff's account each time that amount exceeds $10.00 until Plaintiff has paid the entire filing fee of $350.00. So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 7/22/2024. (Urizandi, Nissheneyra)
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Wilson M. Gonzales. (Kenny, Meghan) |
|
TEXT ORDER: Mr. Gonzales is directed to provide to the Court his Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for the six months preceding the filing of this complaint by July 26, 2024. re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Wilson M. Gonzales. So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 6/26/2024. (Kenny, Meghan)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Wilson M. Gonzales. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Hill, Cherelle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Wilson M. Gonzales. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Envelope)(Hill, Cherelle) |
| Case assigned to District Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Hill, Cherelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
