Fripp v. Dillon County Detention Center
Plaintiff: Gerome Fripp
Defendant: Dillon County Detention Center
Case Number: 9:2008cv02444
Filed: July 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Prison:Prison Condition Office
County: Dillon
Presiding Judge: R Bryan Harwell
Presiding Judge: George C Kosko
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Paige Gossett that it is recommended that this action be dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution. 1 Objections to R&R due by 4/6/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige Jones Gossett on 3/19/09. (ahen, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fripp v. Dillon County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gerome Fripp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dillon County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?