Whitefield v. Brown et al
William Whitefield |
Mrs L Brown, D Drew and BOP |
0:2010cv02730 |
October 22, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Rock Hill Office |
Marlboro |
Henry F Floyd |
Paige J Gossett |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS adopting 29 Report and Recommendations, dismissing Complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 11/21/2011. (jpet, ) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting 38 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 10/31/2011.(jpet, ) |
Filing 34 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS adopting 29 Report and Recommendations, dismissing Complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 10/19/2011. (jpet, ) |
Filing 28 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 4/18/2011. (jpet, ) |
Filing 13 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Henry F Floyd on 1/31/2011. (jpet, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.