JACOBS v. BERRIOS et al
NATHAN E. JACOBS |
BERRIOS, VIALAPANDA and WHALEN |
0:2015cv02514 |
June 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Rock Hill Office |
XUS, Outside State |
Paige J Gossett |
Sol Blatt |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations in full and dismisses this action without prejudice and without issuance and service of process re 23 ; and denying 25 Motion to Amend/Correct and the Court overrules the Plaintiff's objections (Entry 37). Signed by Honorable Sol Blatt, Jr on 1/21/16.(jwol, ) |
Filing 35 JUDGMENT dismissing this action without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. (gmil) |
Filing 34 ORDER ADOPTING 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION denying 25 Motion to Amend/Correct filed by NATHAN E. JACOBS, and dismissing this action without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Sol Blatt, Jr on 11/18/2015. (gmil) |
Filing 22 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350. Motion granted: 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Motions denied: 21 Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendants and Motion for Relief Sought, filed by Nathan E. Jacobs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 10/7/2015. (gmil) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.