Dowling v. United States of America et al
||Vernon Brent Dowling
||United States of America, Dept of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FBOP Director Samuels, All Federal Employees Responsible for Negligence, Injury, and Damages and Health Services/Corporate Contract, Officer Walker, Officer Platts, Lt Merrill and A Mansukhani
||October 21, 2016
||US District Court for the District of South Carolina
||Rock Hill Office
||Paige J Gossett
||David C Norton
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 12, 2018
ORDER denying 61 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 61 Motion for TRO; granting in part and denying in part 87 Motion to Dismiss; denying 120 Motion for TRO; denying 120 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; adopting Report and Recommendations re 127 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on February 12, 2018.(span, )
|May 31, 2017
ORDER directing each legal representative entering an appearance in this matter on behalf of any defendant to complete a Defendant's Certification and file it with the court within seven (7) days from the date of this ord er. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if any party disagrees with the court's construction of the Plaintiff's claims, he or she may file an appropriate motion with the court within seven (7) days from the date of this order. (Defendant's Certification due by 6/7/2017. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 5/31/2017. (bgoo)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?