Rose v. Young
| James Rose |
| Lisa Young |
| 0:2017cv02921 |
| October 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Rock Hill Office |
| Richland |
| Paige J Gossett |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER adopting the 105 Report and Recommendation, dismissing this action with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), and terminating the pending 66 95 motions for summary judgment as moot. Signed by Chief Judge R. Bryan Harwell on 4/30/2019. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER directing plaintiff to advise the court as to whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to the defendant's 95 motion for summary judgment within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. Plaintiff is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action may be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Response to Motion due by 3/15/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 3/1/2019. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER holding that, as Plaintiff has failed to provide information or identify any witness in accordance with the discovery process, he is hereby "not allowed to use that information or witness to supply evidence on a motion, at a hearing, or at trial" unless he can meet the standard provided in Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 12/20/2018. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER suspending all deadlines in this case and directing Plaintiff to serve his discovery responses on the defendant by September 26, 2018. Failure to comply will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed with prejduice pursuant to Rule 37 and/or for failure to prosecute. Motion denied: 63 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 9/12/2018. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER directing the plaintiff to advise the court as to whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to the defendant's 55 motion for sanctions within fourteen (14) days from the date of this or der. Plaintiff is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Rule 37 and/or for failure to prosecute. (Response to Motion due by 8/14/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 7/31/2018. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying the plaintiff's 37 motion for appointment of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 5/18/2018. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER directing each legal representative entering an appearance in this matter on behalf of any defendant to complete a Defendant's Certification and file it with the court within seven (7) days from the date of this ord er. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if any party disagrees with the court's construction of the Plaintiff's claims, he or she may file an appropriate motion with the court within seven (7) days from the date of this order. (Defendant's Certification due by 4/16/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 4/9/2018. (bgoo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rose v. Young | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Rose | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lisa Young | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
