Stallings v. Shook & Fletcher Insulation Co et al
Mary Ann Stallings |
Shook & Fletcher Insulation Co and Sean Robert Fowler |
0:2019cv02369 |
August 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion to Change Venue. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 8/29/2019.(cbru, ) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Shook & Fletcher Insulation Co.(Bradshaw, James) |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION to Change Venue by Shook & Fletcher Insulation Co. Response to Motion due by 9/12/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Bradshaw, James) |
Filing 4 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for York County County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Acknowledgment of State Clerk of Court)(Bradshaw, James) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Shook & Fletcher Insulation Co.(asni, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from York County, case number 2019-CP-46-02495. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8631063), filed by Shook & Fletcher Insulation Co. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(asni, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.