Kelley v. Lexington County et al
Plaintiff: Rodney Shelton Kelley
Defendant: Lexington County, Lexington County Detention Center, Lt. Felder and Sgt. Keyes
Case Number: 0:2022cv00086
Filed: January 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Paige J Gossett
Referring Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Nature of Suit: Prison:Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2022 Filing 21 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 19 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Rodney Shelton Kelley, 47387, Lexington County Detention Center, 521 Gibson Road, Lexington, SC 29072. (dist)
March 4, 2022 Filing 19 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting for good cause shown #18 Motion for Extension of Time. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 3/4/2022. (kkus, )
March 3, 2022 Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint or otherwise plead by Lt. Felder, Sgt. Keyes. Response to Motion due by 3/17/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)No proposed order.Motions referred to Paige J Gossett.(Davidson, William)
February 18, 2022 Filing 16 OBJECTION to #9 Report and Recommendation by Rodney Shelton Kelley. Reply to Objections due by 3/4/2022 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope) (dist)
February 15, 2022 Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rodney Shelton Kelley. Lt. Felder served on 2/11/2022, answer due 3/4/2022; Sgt. Keyes served on 2/11/2022, answer due 3/4/2022. (dist)
February 4, 2022 Filing 13 Summons Issued as to Lt. Felder, Sgt. Keyes. Service due by 5/5/2022. (dist) (Main Document 13 replaced on 2/8/2022 with flattened, edited document) (dist).
February 4, 2022 Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 Clerk's Notice, #10 Order 1983, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Rodney Shelton Kelley, 47387, Lexington County Detention Center, 521 Gibson Road, Lexington, SC 29072. (dist)
February 4, 2022 Filing 11 Clerk's Notice: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis addressed in #10 . (dist)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER authorizing service of process and collection of filing fee. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of 350.00. Plaintiff is also directed to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 2/4/2022. (dist)
February 4, 2022 Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that Defendants Lexington County and Lexington County Detention Center be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 2/18/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 2/4/2022. (dist)
January 11, 2022 Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Columbia. (dist)
January 10, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Rodney Shelton Kelley. Response to Motion due by 1/24/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett. (dist) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/11/2022 with corrected scan of document.) (dist)
January 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Rodney Shelton Kelley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dist) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/11/2022 with corrected scan of document) (dist)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kelley v. Lexington County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodney Shelton Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lexington County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lexington County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt. Felder
Represented By: William Henry Davidson, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt. Keyes
Represented By: William Henry Davidson, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?