Leppard v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: John Samuel Leppard, Jr
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2011cv02453
Filed: September 13, 2011
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Aiken Office
County: Pickens
Referring Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 13, 2012 29 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 25 Motion for Attorney Fees, directing the Commissioner to pay Plaintiff $2,900.00 by August 13, 2012. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 07/13/2012.(bshr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leppard v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Samuel Leppard, Jr
Represented By: Hal Wood Roach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?