Brown v. Cutludge
Petitioner: Gifford Brown
Respondent: Leroy Cartledge
Case Number: 1:2012cv00139
Filed: January 13, 2012
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Aiken Office
County: Williamsburg
Presiding Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Presiding Judge: Terry L Wooten
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER ACCEPTING 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, granting the Respondent's motion for summary judgment 16 . The Petitioner's application is denied and this action is dismissed. Additionally, the Court concludes that it is not appropriate to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 10/3/2012. (abuc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Cutludge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Leroy Cartledge
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gifford Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?