Chestnut v. Singleton
| Raymond Edward Chestnut |
| K Singleton |
| 1:2013cv02250 |
| August 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Aiken Office |
| Marlboro |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice. (mwal)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER denying 64 MOTION to Compel; denying 65 MOTION to Compel; denying 66 MOTION for Physical Examination; denying 67 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum; denying 74 MOTION for Sanctions; den ying 78 MOTION for Entry of Default; denying 79 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Raymond Chestnut; denying 83 MOTION for Sanctions; denying 88 MOTION for Spoilation Sanctions; and denying 90 MOTION for Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 4/13/2015. (mwal)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER denying 58 Motion for Copies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 9/12/2014.(abuc)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER ADOPTING 45 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 19 Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by K Singleton. It is ordered that Defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice to the right to refile at a later time. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 8/20/2014. (abuc)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER denying 37 Motion for Discovery; denying 39 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 41 Motion for Polygraph Examination. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 8/4/2014.(abuc) Modified to correct file date on 8/5/2014 (abuc).
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER re 22 Report and Recommendation. The Court recommits the matter back to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. The Magistrate Judge should give Defendant thirty (30) days in which to file with the Court the video evi dence referred in Plaintiff's Documentation of Informal Resolution Attempt, if any such evidence exists and if they wish to make it a part of the record. The Plaintiff should also be given an additional thirty (30) days to submit any further evi dence in response to Defendant's motion. If Defendant produces the video, the Magistrate Judge should review it and re-evaluate the matter, and should submit another Report and Recommendation upon review of any additional filings by the parties. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 4/8/2014. (abuc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chestnut v. Singleton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Raymond Edward Chestnut | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: K Singleton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
