Watkins et al v. First Citizens Bank and Trust Company, Inc.
| Robert L. Watkins and Robert J. Williams |
| First Citizens Bank and Trust Company, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv00122 |
| January 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Aiken Office |
| Aiken |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court finds no clear error and therefore adopts and incorporates by reference the R & R [ECF No. 73 ] of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant's m otion for summary judgment [ECF No. 31 ] and DISMISSES this case with prejudice. The Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiffs' motion for assistance in obtaining a cashier's check [ECF No. 70 ]. Signed by the Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 10/23/2017. (hcic, )
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER directing Plaintiffs to complete and return to the Clerk of Court within seven (7) days a subpoena addressed to Capital City Bank, at which time the Clerk of Court shall issue the subpoena. (Completed subpoena due by 8/23/2017. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 8/16/2017. (bgoo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
