Sandviks v. PhD Fitness LLC

Plaintiff: John Sandviks
Defendant: PhD Fitness LLC
Case Number: 1:2017cv00744
Filed: March 17, 2017
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Aiken Office
County: Aiken
Presiding Judge: J Michelle Childs
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 20, 2018 44 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Dismiss. The court grants Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as to Plaintiff's claims for breach of express and implied warranties, and negligent and intentional misrepresentation. The court denies Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as to Plaintiff's claims for fraudulent inducement and unjust enrichment. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 3/20/2018.(asni, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sandviks v. PhD Fitness LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Sandviks
Represented By: Harper Todd Segui
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PhD Fitness LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?