Simpson v. Contract Callers Inc
Plaintiff: Antenet N Simpson
Defendant: Contract Callers Inc
Case Number: 1:2018cv03098
Filed: November 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: J Michelle Childs
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Contract Callers Inc. (mbro, )
November 15, 2018 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Antenet N Simpson.(mbro, )
November 15, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Contract Callers Inc ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8111054.), filed by Antenet N Simpson. Service due by 2/13/2019(mbro, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simpson v. Contract Callers Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antenet N Simpson
Represented By: David Andrew Maxfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Contract Callers Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?