Satterfield v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Jeanna Kay Satterfield
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administrative Record
Case Number: 1:2019cv01474
Filed: May 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Cameron McGowan Currie
Referring Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2019 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeanna Kay Satterfield. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Certificate of Service)(Jordan, Woodrow)
July 10, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeanna Kay Satterfield. Commissioner of Social Security Administration served on 5/29/2019, pursuant to Local Rule 83.VII.03 answer due 9/26/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service - US Attorney's Office, #2 Proof of Service - US Attorney General)(bshr, ). Modified on 07/11/2019 to correct event code(bshr, ).
May 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 05/23/2019. (bshr, )
May 22, 2019 Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Jeanna Kay Satterfield.. (Jordan, Woodrow)
May 21, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (bshr, )
May 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 5/21/19. (vhor)
May 21, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Jeanna Kay Satterfield. Response to Motion due by 6/4/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Shiva V Hodges.(bshr, )
May 21, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.02 regarding Consents to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website., filed by Jeanna Kay Satterfield. Service due by 8/19/2019(bshr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Satterfield v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeanna Kay Satterfield
Represented By: Woodrow Grady Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administrative Record
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?