Sapp v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Nicole Taneka Sapp
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administrative Record
Case Number: 1:2019cv02213
Filed: August 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Donald C Coggins
Referring Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2019 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nicole Taneka Sapp. Commissioner of Social Security Administration served on 9/19/2019, pursuant to Local Rule 83.VII.03 answer due 1/17/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service - US Attorney General, #2 Proof of Service - Commissioner of Social Security Administration)(bshr, )
September 18, 2019 Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Addressee: Nicole Taneka Sapp. Document Returned: #5 Order Service - Non-Inmate. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bshr, )
September 9, 2019 Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Order Service - Non-Inmate placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Nicole Taneka Sapp, 1621 North Cashua Drive, Florence, SC 29501 (bshr, )
September 9, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (bshr, )
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, authorizing service of process by clerk and directing plaintiff to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 09/09/2019. (bshr, )
August 7, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Nicole Taneka Sapp. Response to Motion due by 8/21/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Shiva V Hodges.(bshr, )
August 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.02 regarding Consents to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website., filed by Nicole Taneka Sapp. Service due by 11/5/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Notice of Decision)(bshr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sapp v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Taneka Sapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administrative Record
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?