Las Dulce v. Mack
| Albert Las Dulce |
| R. Mack |
| 1:2020cv02650 |
| July 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Donald C Coggins |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Albert Las Dulce, 60219 083, Federal Correctional Institution, PO Box 725, Edgefield, SC 29824. (lbak) |
Filing 10
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff notifies the court within the time set for filing objections to this Report and Recommendation that he wishes to continue with this case and complies with the court's prior order, the Clerk is directed to vacate this Report and Recommendation and return the file to the undersigned for further handling. If, however, no objections are filed, the Clerk shall forward this Report and Recommendation to the district judge for disposition. Objections to R&R due by 9/18/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 9/3/2020. (lbak)
|
| Filing 8 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #7 Proper Form Order, standard complaint form, IFP Application, one Summons and one Form USM-285 placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Albert Las Dulce, 60219 083, Federal Correctional Institution, PO Box 725, Edgefield, SC 29824. (lbak) |
|
Filing 7
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 8/31/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 8/10/2020. (lbak)
|
| Filing 5 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #4 Proper Form Order, standard complaint form, IFP Application, one Summons and one Form USM-285 placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Albert Las Dulce, 60219 083, Federal Correctional Institution, PO Box 725, Edgefield, SC 29824 (lbak) |
|
Filing 4
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 8/7/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 7/17/2020. (lbak)
|
| Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Greenville. (lbak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against R. Mack, filed by Albert Las Dulce. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Las Dulce v. Mack | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: R. Mack | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Albert Las Dulce | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
