Lilly v. Thompson et al
| Thurman Van Lilly |
| Fred Thompson, Morris Elmore, James Blackwell, McKither Bodison, D Nunnally, Eugene Skipper, S Jenkins, L Randall, D McCommons and Dorris Gantt |
| 2:2008cv00266 |
| January 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Charleston Office |
| Colleton |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Robert S Carr |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 38 of Magistrate Judge Robert S Carr, incorporating them herein by reference, and granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by L Randall, Morris Elmore, Dorris Gantt, Eugene Skipper, James Blackwell, Fred Thompson, McKither Bodison, D McCommons, D Nunnally, S Jenkins. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 3/10/2009. (ssan, )
|
|
Filing
38
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Robert S Carr that 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by L Randall, Morris Elmore, Dorris Gantt, Eugene Skipper, James Blackwell, Fred Thompson, McKither Bodison, D McCommons, D Nunnally, S Jenkins be granted, all other motions be denied and this case dismissed without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 2/2/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S Carr on 1/12/2009. (ssan, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
