United States of America et al v. GenPhar Inc et al
United States of America, Elaine Van Voris, Peter Van Voris and John Johnston |
GenPhar Inc, Jian-yun Dong, Danher Wang, Heung Yeung Yeung, Vaxima Inc, Robert Tex S Small, Jr. and Estate of William T Ratliff Jr |
2:2009cv00005 |
January 2, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Charleston Office |
Charleston |
Richard M Gergel |
Kaymani D West |
Other Contract |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 216 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report (ECF No. 214 ) and grants Relators' Rule 41(a)(2) conditional motion for court order of dismissal of claims (ECF No. 187 ), with prejudice as to Relators and without prejudice as to the Government. The Court also find that Defendants are not entitled to attorney's fees or costs pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d). Furthermore, the dismissal of claims is withou t prejudice to Relators being permitted to petition the Court for attorney's fees and costs within 60 days of a final judgment affirming the convictions in the related criminal matters. Lastly, the Court denies Dong's motion for recovery of legal fees (ECF No. 194 ). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 3/27/2018. (prou, ) |
Filing 168 ORDER: The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Reports (ECF Nos. 136 and 144 ). Accordingly, the Court grants the motions to dismiss filed by Small, Ratliff, and Dong (ECF Nos. 99 , 104 , and 123 ). However , the Court holds the dismissals in abeyance for a period of 14 days during which time the Relators may file an amended complaint addressing the issues outlined in the Magistrate Judge's Reports. The Court also denies Dong's motion to jo in in and supplement the motions to dismiss filed by Small and Ratliff (ECF No. 124 ). The Court grants Defendant GenPhar's motion to set aside entry ofdefault (ECF No. 157 ). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 5/31/2017. (prou, ) |
Filing 142 ORDER denying as moot 85 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer and 85 Motion to Stay; denying as moot 119 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 10/27/2016.(dsto, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.