Fowler v. Riley
Petitioner: Tyrone Edward Fowler
Respondent: Tim Riley
Case Number: 2:2009cv01244
Filed: May 12, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Greenville
Presiding Judge: Robert S Carr
Presiding Judge: Henry M Herlong
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The court adopts Magistrate Judge Carrs Report and Recommendation and incorporates it herein. It is thereforeORDERED that this action is dismissed for lack of prosecution. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 11/16/09. (ltap, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fowler v. Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tyrone Edward Fowler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tim Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?