Adams v. US Airways
Plaintiff: Janine M Adams
Defendant: US Airways
Case Number: 2:2010cv01658
Filed: June 28, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Charleston
Presiding Judge: Robert S Carr
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER adopting 40 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks; granting 29 Motion to Dismiss, dismissing plaintiff's claims with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 4/5/2011.(sshe, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. US Airways
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janine M Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Airways
Represented By: Daniel E Farrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?