Bank of America v. Weston
Plaintiff: Bank of America
Defendant: Kenneth Weston
Case Number: 2:2011cv00468
Filed: February 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Berkeley
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER adopting 10 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks to Remand this matter to the Court of Common Pleas for Berkeley County, thus finding as moot 18 Motion to Remand. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 4/29/11.(hhil, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bank of America v. Weston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth Weston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bank of America
Represented By: James Edward Brogdon, III
Represented By: Alana Odom Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?