Berry v. Eagleton
Petitioner: Kristopher Wilmont Berry
Respondent: Willie Eagleton
Case Number: 2:2013cv03149
Filed: November 20, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Marlboro
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Presiding Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER adopting 6 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks. This action is dismissed without prejudice and without requiring the respondents to file a return. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 1/23/2014.(ssam, ) Modified to edit text to correct date order signed on 1/24/2014 (ssam, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berry v. Eagleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kristopher Wilmont Berry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Willie Eagleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?