Andrews et al v. Pella Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Christy Andrews, Greg Andrews, Tanya Conlay and Gary Conlay
Defendant: Pella Corporation
Case Number: 2:2014cv00539
Filed: February 27, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: XUS, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER denying 96 Motion for Summary Judgment Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 12/18/15.(elim, )
October 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER granting 81 Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs' class claims with prejudice; granting 82 Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint provided the Second Amended Complaint does not contain class claims or an individual claim for breach of express warranty. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 10/27/15.(elim, )
January 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER granting 72 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice; denying 74 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice, and Dismissing the Andrews' claims without prejudice. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 1/13/15.(elim, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrews et al v. Pella Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christy Andrews
Represented By: Richard J Arsenault
Represented By: Andrew Allen Lemmon
Represented By: Irma L. Netting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Greg Andrews
Represented By: Richard J Arsenault
Represented By: Andrew Allen Lemmon
Represented By: Irma L. Netting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanya Conlay
Represented By: Richard J Arsenault
Represented By: Andrew Allen Lemmon
Represented By: Irma L. Netting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Conlay
Represented By: Richard J Arsenault
Represented By: Andrew Allen Lemmon
Represented By: Irma L. Netting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pella Corporation
Represented By: Michael Tucker Cole
Represented By: Terry Christovich Gay
Represented By: Oscar M. Gwin, IV
Represented By: John P. Mandler
Represented By: James A O'Neal
Represented By: G Mark Phillips
Represented By: Kevin Richard Tully
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?