Weckesser v. Knight Enterprises SE LLC
Plaintiff: Patrick Weckesser
Defendant: Knight Enterprises SE LLC
Case Number: 2:2016cv02053
Filed: June 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Charleston
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER AND OPINION The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike settlement offers and for entry of a protective order (Dkt. No. 100 ). The Court STRIKES all offer letters, opt-out forms, and settlement checks submitted to Opt-In Plaintiffs and all offer letters, opt-out forms, and settlement checks signed by Opt-In Plaintiffs. The Court ORDERS that within SEVEN (7) DAYS of this Order, Plaintiffs' counsel shall submit a draft a corrective notice to the Cour t, consistent with this Order. Once approved, Defendant must send via mail and e-mail, at their expense, the notice to any Opt-In Plaintiffs who signed an Offer Letter or an individual settlement document. Finally, the Court ORDERS that Defendant, its employees, or its agents, SHALL NOT communicate by telephone, email, in person or via any other means with the Named Plaintiff, Opt-In Plaintiffs and their family members regarding the pending lawsuit, settlement, their decision to participate as plaintiffs, or their representation. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 7/22/2019.(sshe, )
June 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER AND OPINION The Court GRANTS IN PART Defendant's motion to dismiss Opt-In Plaintiff Martin Davila and Davila is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Dkt. No. 84 .) The Court also GRANTS the Parties' Joint Motion for Leave to Depose Opt-In Plaintiffs Brian Rowland and Willie Malone. (Dkt. No. 85 .) AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 6/7/2019.(sshe, )
May 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff's Motion to Quash (Dkt. No. 73 .) The Motion is DENIED IN PART to the extent that the subpoenas properly seek documents regarding "the quality of Plainti ff Ebert's work, the length of his relationship, contracts or agreements the prior employers had with him" and IT IS ORDERED THAT, by May 18, 2019, the third-parties will comply with that portion of the subpoenas. The Motion is otherwise GRANTED and, except for the documents ordered to be produced, the subpoenas are otherwise QUASHED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 5/13/2019.(sshe, )
August 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER GRANTING 29 Plaintiff's Motion for conditional class certification and equitable tolling. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 8/27/2018.(sshe, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weckesser v. Knight Enterprises SE LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick Weckesser
Represented By: Ashley Long Falls
Represented By: Joseph Scott Falls
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Knight Enterprises SE LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?