Roberts v. Lewis
Petitioner: Emory W Roberts, Jr
Respondent: Dwayne Lewis
Case Number: 2:2017cv00453
Filed: February 15, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Berkeley
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER AND OPINION declining to adopt 54 Report and Recommendation. The petition for habeas relief (Dkt. No. 1 ) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 10/20/2017.(ssam, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberts v. Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Emory W Roberts, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dwayne Lewis
Represented By: James Anthony Mabry
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?