Jackson v. City of North Charleston et al
John C Jackson, III |
Officer Ghe, Mayor Keith Summey, City of North Charleston and Chief Reggie Burgess |
2:2018cv03154 |
November 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Bristow Marchant |
David C Norton |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant. Plaintiff has failed to file any opposition to the Defendants' motions, or to respond to these motions in any way. Therefore, it is recommended that the Defendants' motions be granted. If the Court adopts this recommendation, the Defendants Summey and Burgess should be dismissed as party Defendants in this case, in toto. Plaintiff's claim for a violation of his constitutional rights will then proceed against the Defendant Ghe in his individual capacity, while his state law claims will proceed against the Defendant City of North Charleston. Objections to R&R due by 1/29/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 01/15/2019. (egra, ) |
Filing 13 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Ghe.(Chandler, J W) |
Filing 12 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Reggie Burgess, City of North Charleston, Keith Summey.(Dorsel, Christopher) |
Filing 11 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 12/31/2018, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 1/14/2019, Rule 26 Report due by 1/14/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 2/4/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 3/4/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 4/4/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 4/4/2019, Discovery due by 6/4/2019, Motions due by 8/5/2019, Mediation Due by 7/5/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 12/10/2018. (egra, ) |
Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Ghe.(Chandler, J W) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Ghe.(Chandler, J W) |
Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Ghe. Response to Motion due by 12/19/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(Chandler, J W) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by City of North Charleston.(Dorsel, Christopher) |
Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Reggie Burgess, City of North Charleston, Keith Summey. Response to Motion due by 12/12/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(Dorsel, Christopher) |
Filing 5 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by John C Jackson, III. Ghe served on 11/26/2018, answer due 12/17/2018. (Frazier, Jerod) |
Filing 4 CONSENT TO REMOVAL FROM STATE COURT by Ghe. (Chandler, J W) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Reggie Burgess, City of North Charleston, Ghe, Keith Summey. (egra, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018-cp-10-4837. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8120542), filed by Keith Summey, City of North Charleston, Reggie Burgess, Ghe. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Certificate of Service) (egra, ) Modified County court on 11/28/2018 (cper, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.