Black v. Barnes et al
| L Neal Black |
| Black & Barnes LLC and Sean Barnes |
| 2:2019cv01676 |
| June 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by L Neal Black. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Black & Barnes LLC Proof of Service, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Sean Barnes Proof of Service)(Klosowski, Bernard) |
| Filing 5 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (jbry, ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (jbry, ) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by L Neal Black.(jbry, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sean Barnes, Black & Barnes LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8496862.), filed by L Neal Black. Service due by 9/9/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Patent No. 10267003, #2 Exhibit B U.S. Design Patent No. D828746, #3 Exhibit C US Design Patent No. D828747, #4 Exhibit D US Design Patent No. D837041, #5 Exhibit E US Design Patent No. D826702, #6 Exhibit F Articles of Organization, #7 Exhibit G Black & Barnes LLC Assignment, #8 Exhibit H Sean Barnes Assignment)(jbry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
